DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD
Planned Parenthood (PP) is the largest provider of abortions in the U.S. and a purveyor of products and programs designed to feed their abortion business. For example, here in Vero Beach Planned Parenthood is pushing hard to get their comprehensive sex education (outrageous content) into our government schools in lieu of abstinence. In 2006, Planned Parenthood performed 289,650 abortions in the U.S., made $112 million in profit, and received $336 million in our tax money to do it. There is a national effort to get this funding stopped and we need to do our part. Please call the following three toll-free numbers and leave a message that as a registered voter, you are asking that the government stop funding Planned Parenthood. This is in keeping with Faithful Citizenship called for by our Catholic faith.
Representative Dave Weldon (R) at 1-800-939-3515
Senator Martinez (R) at 1-866-630-7106
Senator Nelson (D) at 1-888-671-4091
PS. The person in most need of contact is Senator Nelson (D) who is pro-abortion.
SUMMER CHALLENGE
Please take a personal survey of relatives, friends and acquaintances this summer. You’ll be amazed at the answers you get.
a) Do you know at what point a pregnancy can no longer be terminated by abortion in the U.S.
b) Do you know why we should vote for the marriage amendment defining marriage
as between a man and a woman? It will be on this November’s ballot in Florida?
Answers:
a) From 1973 until present, abortion is allowed from the time of conception until the time of delivery for any reason. In other words, all nine months.
b) The traditional family is the building block of all societies: Male + female = children. If you destroy this building block, society ceases to flourish and even exist. The family is under attack from all angles: divorce, morality (abortion, contraception), financial, co-habitation, etc. Adding and protecting non-building block unions drains time, energy, and resources away from support of the traditional family. When viewed objectively, what is proposed is that any pair who is willing to declare some sort of bond should be given economic concessions by the community. When society permits persons of the same sex to “marry” based simply on their declaration of love and commitment, there is no reason that three committed persons of the same sex cannot marry. Lastly, why would we want to legitimize disordered lifestyles when study after study indicate that male and female homosexuals have much higher rates of interpersonal maladjustment, depression, conduct disorder, childhood abuse (both sexual and violent), domestic violence, alcohol or drug abuse, anxiety and dependency on psychiatric care than heterosexuals.
Questions or challenges? Use the question box on our web site at www.stjotc.org.
FLORIDA MARRIAGE PROTECTION AMENDMENT MAKES NOVEMBER 2008 BALLOT
WE DID IT! The Florida Division of Elections certified the Florida Marriage Protection Amendment on February 1, 2008 to be on the November 4, 2008 General Election ballot. The amendment was certified with 649,346 petitions or 38,337 more than the 611,009 required petitions.
The amendment was in jeopardy of not making the ballot just two weeks before the deadline date of February 1, 2008 after the Division of Elections determined it was 22,000 petitions short.
However, thanks to the urgent email requests from the American Family Association, Family Research Council, Our American Values and Wall Builders, the political committee Florida4marriage.org received close to 92,000 more petitions in the final two weeks.
The Florida Marriage Protection Amendment reads: "In as much as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized."
The Respect Life Office of St. John of the Cross thanks all those who signed the petition. Next, we vote!
AFFIRMS ABORTION/BREAST CANCER LINK
By THADDEUS M. BAKLINSKI
(From 12/16/07 Bulletin)
CHICAGO (Life Site News) A new study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons documents the fact that abortion is the "best predictor of breast cancer" in eight European nations.
While this study was ignored by much of the major media, Dennis Byrne of The Chicago Tribune, wrote a commentary entitled, "Snubbing cancer study will only hurt women: Research showing link to abortion ignored by media."
Karen Malec of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer said: "The media's behavior is very problematic. When the history, books are written on the abortion-breast cancer link, women are going to be appalled by the major media's behavior on this matter and the media will suffer further loss of credibility."
"The mainstream media have aggressively promoted abortion and the abortion-breast cancer link would mean that more of their readers are getting breast cancer because they believed what the media were telling them," she added.
The usual argument used by critics of abortion-breast cancer link studies is "recall bias," which claims flawed research due to its being based on interviews with women who have breast cancer and admit to having had one or more abortions.
After the study was published, critics attacked the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, saying the research was politically motivated. "It was a shoot -the-messenger approach," explained Karem Malec, "because science really is not on their side, so they argued ideology."
Furthermore, this research was discussed in the insurance magazine The Actuary. Insurance actuaries were advised to adjust their insurance premiums and reserves accordingly in order to plan for a 50% increase in breast cancer projected out to 2029.
Malec continued, "The abortion-breast cancer link critics are having a hard time explaining why an insurance magazine would publish a 'politically motivated' article discussing the abortion-breast cancer link: and advising its readers that this epidemic will be costly for the insurance industry and consumers. Insurance companies, after all, are in the business of making money and pleasing their stockholders, not in dealing with politically motivated issues."
She concluded: "For people who don't know whom to believe, when the insurance industry starts talking about the issue, then we know it's a serious problem."
VOTER SUPPORT INFORMATION - A CATHOLICS GUIDE TO FORMING YOUR CONSCIENCE
The Five Non-Negotiables
The same eyes that read the Bible, also read the ballots. The same hands that pray to God, also cast our votes. As Catholic Christians, we do not leave our faith outside the voting booth. Know that God will hold us accountable for our votes, whether we limit evil or enable evil! It is, therefore, our responsibility as Catholics to be fully informed on where the candidates stand, regardless of party, and to vote as Jesus would vote rather than for personal gain. Supine ignorance, the unwillingness to inform our consciences on Church moral teaching as well as candidate positions on same, is something for which we will be held accountable.
The 5 Non-Negotiables are: Abortion, Euthanasia, Human Cloning, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and Same Sex Unions. Some say that most moral issues are of equal concern, a seamless garment if you will. That is NOT true; there is a seam. The five non-negotiables are on one side of the seam. The other moral issues are of lesser moral importance and on the other side of the seam. Why? Because if a candidate is not on the side of life, the other moral issues don’t matter.
“Working for the growth of the Kingdom in every sector of society…means rejecting a false dichotomy between faith and political life, since, as the Second Vatican Council put it, ‘there is no human activity - even in secular affairs - which can be withdrawn from God's dominion’ (Lumen Gentium, 36).” Pope Benedict XVI Homily, Mass at Yankee Stadium, Bronx, NY, April 20, 2008
Why PRO-LIFE Presidents Matter
What if someone told you that the only significant influence the President has on the economy is in selecting the Chairman of the Federal Reserve? Most serious voters would rightly dismiss such a narrow claim as absurd. Yet how often do we hear the daft assertion that the only significant role the president plays in advancing the pro-life agenda is in nominating Supreme Court justices (important as that is)? Well, the president has a substantial and broad-based role in protecting life. Here are a few examples of why it matters:
- Preserving the Pro-Life Riders – Each year pro-life “riders” are attached to the annual appropriations bills which prevent public funds from supporting abortions, abortion providers, or abortion promoters. They include the Dickey-Wicker provision which prohibits federal funding of human embryo research. The Kemp-Kasten Amendment which prevents funding to participants in coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization. The Hyde-Weldon provision which offers conscience protections for health care entities that refuse to provide or encourage abortions and does so by withholding federal funds from states that discriminate against entities or individual people. The Mexico City Policy which prohibits foreign aid money from going to all organizations that perform or promote abortions.
- Filing of amicus briefs before the judiciary: prevents broad legal effects of court decisions going beyond the parties directly involved in a case.
- Issuance of executive orders: They direct the operation of officers within the executive branch.
- Selection of political appointments: They have a significant impact on the pro-life cause.
- Using the power of the veto which can force legislators to eliminate the inclusion of any pro-death content such as abortion (including born alive killing after abortion), euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, human cloning, and same sex marriage in legislation
- Using the “bully pulpit” by persuasively advocating a Pro-life agenda.
Christians have an obligation to the most vulnerable members of our society to elect politicians with a robust view of human dignity and the temerity to govern. We betray this duty when we downplay the role of the executive branch in advancing the pro-life cause.